Monday, 30 January 2012
I have decided to take part in this round even though I am not currently employed in a library. I was a Learning Resources Manager in FE but was made redundant in August. I hope I will be allowed to bend the rules as I still consider myself a librarian, even if not currently working as one.
Hopefully this will change soon as I have a job interview tomorrow! It's in a different area of education so I'll need to convince them my skills and experience can provide them with what is needed.
So today my time will be spent finishing my presentation using XMind and Prezi. I'll also be reading through all the info about the role and prepare some key points and questions.
I will also be be checking all my clothes are in good order and that my bag is packed with everything I need, my nails are filed and my shoes polished!
I'll be tweeting during the day to let you know how I'm getting on. @lindsaywallace
Posted by Lindsay Wallace at 10:51
Saturday, 14 January 2012
It's been a few months, I was made redundant last year and have been struggling to keep my professional mojo going with the knock in confidence I've had. Twitter and RSS feeds from blogs I subscribe to have kept me in touch and ensured I still feel part of the library and eLearning communities. I haven't felt engaged enough to participate though - I had a false start at one point (responding to a report on digital literacies in schools and colleges that didn't mention libraries) but went down with flu and fell off the face of the internet again for a while!
Yesterday I read a blog post from Simon Barron (see yesterday's post) and felt I had something to say in response. That response got too long for a a comment, so the post was written. Simon was kind enough to tweet about my post and when Ned Potter made similar points to me in his blog post, I posted a comment there and wrote today's earlier post. He was also kind enough to pop over and comment and also add a link to my post in his comments.
I appreciate this is everyday stuff in the blogosphere but I can't tell you what all this has done for my confidence. To have colleagues who I respect saying positive things about my posts has worked wonders, so I hope I can pay forward with comments on other people's blogs - and learn a lot in the process ;-)
Picture credit seeking.wikispaces.com/ACALforum
Friday, 13 January 2012
Spoon feeding is only the start for students, but we may also want to go back to it later in their careers.
Ned Potter (thewikiman http://thewikiman.org/blog/?p=1821 ) has also blogged on the spoon feeding debate. I was pleased to see that he had taken a similar line to my post yesterday emphasising the need to take a developmental approach. He says
spoon-feeding should be the first step in a structured approach to helping students navigate their way through a degree, with the library embedded and responsive at all stagesI couldn't agree more! Although of course he acknowledges this is the ideal and not the norm yet!
What also caught my eye was the comment from jothelibrarian talking about the same process in the corporate library where she works.
This reminds me of discussions I've had before about the poor transfer of information skills from one context to another. I worked with a librarian in an FE college who had recently joined us from a local high school. One day she was literally banging her head against the office wall in frustration. Students she had taught in the high school were in but had forgotten everything she had taught them there about using indexes in books, online catalogues etc. She knew they had these skills in high school, why not in College a few months later?
It looks like this spoon feeding analogy doesn't quite go along the same lines as weaning a baby - we will need to do it more than once!
Lastly Jo comments that she goes back to spoon feeding herself with senior colleagues
However those colleagues that go on to become senior managers often have need of the spoon again. They are so busy, and have so much going on that there is simply no way they could do all the research they need. With those colleagues, I find a good (fast!) reference interview followed by some swift research on their behalf is the way to go.This is a very similar approach to the one I used with teaching staff in the FE & Sixth Form Colleges I have worked in. Not only does it support our colleagues and organisations by using our skills to best effect, it is also great PR and really helps to build the good relationships that are likely to foster the partnerships we want to build in teaching all those literacies.
Picture credit freeloosedirt http://flic.kr/p/4Sb8HN
Wednesday, 11 January 2012
I've been stimulated to write this post in response to Simon Barron http://undaimonia.blogspot.com/2012/01/help-how-much-help-should-libraries-be.html and Georgina Hardy's post http://cpdbygeorge.wordpress.com/2011/11/30/133/ mentioned in Funktious's comment. (Hope all those references make sense!)
The thrust of Simon's post is that we shouldn't help too much in academic libraries to ensure the students develop their own information literacy, however Georgina considers that we can over emphasise this and "We must be very careful not to value process above principles."
We have had similar discussions in FE libraries - the natural inclination of the library staff I've worked with is to help and find the information the students are looking for; but we have tried to wean ourselves off this and support students to use the catalogue etc to find resources themselves.
I can very much identify with both sides of this debate as I also wanted to get our students (HE & FE) to use the online resource we subscribed to, and this was very much an uphill battle. I agree with Georgina that the main point of providing these resources is for the students to engage with them as part of their learning.
I have no data to back this contention, but I would estimate that in any cohort of students there will be the following categories of students in varying proportions:
- those who are actively engaging with the online content and learn the research skills alongside their subject and can carry those forward into future careers
- those who struggle but who will come to info lit sessions and ask for help at enquiry desks
- those who struggle and get by on the bare minimum not fully engaging with the resources available or picking up any research skills despite our best efforts.
Maybe the solution is to offer different levels of content links as the students progress - lots for first years and decreasing for second and third years, together of course with lots of tips on searching and evaluating. We also need to be explicit as to why we are doing this so that the students don't think they are just getting a poorer service in later years!
On a personal note I have to confess that the best mark I got as an undergraduate was for an assignment where I left it too late to get access to any of the (print only) resources and had to muddle through with what was to hand. This drove my creativity and I made links I might not otherwise have done. I wouldn't recommend this as a strategy to others though - there have been plenty of times where deadline surfing has done me no favours at all!
Picture credit: http://farm5.staticflickr.com/4091/5096437962_91971f8d52.jpg Jessica M Cross